Over the summer there’s been considerable commentary and debate on wine assessment and a discussion on the matter even made it to the heights of the BBC’s Radio 4 Today Programme. I won’t go into details here, but it seemed to start as a journalistic spat at the competence of wine judges with inconsistency cited as evidence. Robert Joseph does a comprehensive overview with references on his indispensable blog
The Joseph Report.
For a while now I’ve been contemplating a post along the lines of why I find it so hard to assess wine. For example, wines I taste and subsequently buy can disappoint when consumed chez nous. It could equally be called why I don’t give scathing wine reviews or, more debatably, the difference between amateurs and pros. I touched on this a few years back with my post on scoring wine.
|
|
The factors that influence me I’ll coin, with an occasional bit of stretching, the 9 W’s.
Where
|
at home, restaurant/bar, tasting, winery, outdoors, party, in-flight etc.
|
When
|
time of day, maybe even the biodynamic calender
|
Who
|
family, friends, like-minded company, “commercial” situations
|
Whence
|
as in what was consumed (liquid or solid) in the build up to the moment
|
Whim
|
personal frame of mind, mood, ability to concentrate, preconception, bad day
|
With/without
|
food and what food
|
Weather
|
temperature (including the wine), humidity, even aircon etc. |
Within
|
the stemware
|
Wine bottle
|
Stuff like when the bottle was opened, how recently bottled, storage conditions of older wines, state of the closure, tasted blind or not, knowledge of price.
|
These are all reasons why passing judgement on a wine with one encounter is often unfair. It may also explain why I often don’t “get” a wine on first tasting, but find it can grow on me with subsequent encounters.
I have most success in finding wines that become favourites from friends, more serious restaurant lists and caviste recommendations. Least successful is at busy stand-up tastings where I can be wowed by tasting samples of over oaked reds and obvious aromatic whites that never work at home, or indeed anyone's home. My theory is that in line-ups subtle understated wines are easily overlooked, out shouted, if not even bullied by bolder styles. All of this can be magnified by unfamiliar surroundings. Perhaps it's really a debate on the subjective vs. objective approach.